From: David Chelimsky <dchelimsky@...>
Date: 2007-01-25T00:25:27+09:00
Subject: Re: test/spec -- was Re: I don't get rspec

On 1/24/07, Luke Ivers <technodolt@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, 24 Jan 2007 22:05:17 +0900
> "David Chelimsky" <dchelimsky@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > On 1/24/07, Christian Neukirchen <chneukirchen@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > "David Chelimsky" <dchelimsky@gmail.com> writes:
> > >
> > > > That said, you can include modules and get reuse that way:
> > > >
> > > > module SomeHelperMethodsUsefulAcrossContexts
> > > > end
> > > >
> > > > context "some context" do
> > > >  include SomeHelperMethodsUsefulAcrossContexts
> > > > end
> > > >
> > > > I'd be surprised if test/spec doesn't already support this out of the box.
> > >
> > > It works exactly the same in test/spec.
> >
> > Glad to hear it. Do you have any feeling about which approach to reuse
> > you personally prefer? Nested contexts or included modules?
> >
> I know I'm not the person that this was targeted at, but I would absolutely
> love to see nested contexts included in rspec... I was just wishing I could
> do that yesterday.

Google this:

pipermail rspec nested contexts

and you'll see what's been said about it before. Feel free to
resurrect the discussion on the rspec-devel or rspec-users list if you
have some new insights to add to the discussion.

Cheers,
David

>
> > >
> > > > Cheers,
> > > > David
> > > --
> > > Christian Neukirchen  <chneukirchen@gmail.com>  http://chneukirchen.org
> > >
> > >
> >
>
>
> --
> Luke Ivers <technodolt@gmail.com>
>
>