From: gwtmp01@...
Date: 2007-01-22T12:15:22+09:00
Subject: Re: Minor Change Proposal for Classes 'Object' and 'Method'


On Jan 21, 2007, at 8:27 PM, dblack@wobblini.net wrote:
>> I'm using 'method body' to be clear that I'm not talking about an  
>> instance
>> of Method.
>
> The instance of Method is what's involved though -- that is, whether
> it should have a "receiver" method.

Sure, but I wasn't talking about one or the other but the  
relationship between
the two. I couldn't just call them both 'method' because that would  
be confusing
so I called one 'method body' and the other 'instance of method'.  I  
was trying to
be clear and I'm not aware of any particular standard terminology for  
these things
so I picked 'method body'.  Other choices might have been 'method  
definition' or,
if you like looking at the internals, a C pointer to a METHOD struct.


Gary Wright