From: Robert Klemme <shortcutter@...>
Date: 2007-01-21T19:55:12+09:00
Subject: Re: Minor Change Proposal for Classes 'Object' and 'Method'

On 20.01.2007 20:30, Vincent Fourmond wrote:
> dblack@wobblini.net wrote:
>> Right, but I don't see that relationship as the same as what we
>> usually call "receiver", which is part of the dynamic process of an
>> object actually receiving a certain message.
> 
>   What about 'target', then ? It shows that it is not necessary the
> receiver, but that it has been considered as a potential one.

Go for it!  "target" sounds perfect to me.

Now, what do we do about the class method? :-)

Kind regards

	robert