From: gwtmp01@...
Date: 2007-01-18T23:52:57+09:00
Subject: Re: [BLOG] Concurrency models


On Jan 18, 2007, at 7:56 AM, pat eyler wrote:
> I enjoyed this post too.  It's one of the ones that's helping me  
> get a handle
> on the concurrency options that are being considered for rubinius.

What does this mean for portability between different implementations  
of Ruby?
I tend to think that concurrency primitives/semantics need to be part  
of the
language itself and so I'm not sure I like the idea of 'rubinius  
concurrency
options' vs. 'Ruby concurrency options'.

Gary Wright