[#21872] Let's work on Windows support — Dave Thomas <Dave@...>

98 messages 2001/10/01
[#21957] Re: Let's work on Windows support — "Benoit Cerrina" <benoit.cerrina@...> 2001/10/02

> I seem to remember that versions of Python compiled with MinGW can't have

[#21960] Re: Let's work on Windows support — "Furio R. Filoseta (tlf.)" <furifilo901@...> 2001/10/02

I am just a developer, not a Guru, but it seems to me that the .NET way

[#21963] Re: Let's work on Windows support — Albert Wagner <alwagner@...> 2001/10/03

On Tuesday 02 October 2001 18:20, you wrote:

[#21965] Re: Let's work on Windows support — "Furio R. Filoseta (tlf.)" <furifilo901@...> 2001/10/03

Come on, for Ruby developers in Windows environment. You may as well be

[#21969] Re: Let's work on Windows support — David Alan Black <dblack@...> 2001/10/03

Hello --

[#22153] Re: Let's work on Windows support — "Conrad Schneiker" <schneiker@...> 2001/10/06

Hi,

[#22154] Re: Let's work on Windows support — David Alan Black <dblack@...> 2001/10/06

Hello --

[#22167] Re: Let's work on Windows support — Mathieu Bouchard <matju@...> 2001/10/06

On Sat, 6 Oct 2001, David Alan Black wrote:

[#22183] Re: Let's work on Windows support — "Furio R. Filoseta (tlf.)" <furifilo901@...> 2001/10/07

Who cares if they ditch the standard ? They will still have to be self

[#21959] Flogging a live Window — Eli Green <eli.green@...>

Ok, I wanted to get away from the theory and conjecture thread of the

23 messages 2001/10/02

[#22003] Marshal won't dump a Proc — "HarryO" <harryo@...>

I would really like to be able to dump a block of code via Marshal#dump,

17 messages 2001/10/03

[#22107] The Windows question still remains... — Robert Hicks <bobhicks@...>

VC++

17 messages 2001/10/04
[#22111] Re: The Windows question still remains... — Robert Hicks <bobhicks@...> 2001/10/05

Shan-leung Maverick WOO wrote:

[#22166] dRuby, Linux and ports — ptkwt@...1.aracnet.com (Phil Tomson)

13 messages 2001/10/06

[#22219] - BRITNEY SPEARS NAKED----WOW!!!!!! — -.597i1468vn4848nc3958vn32858238@...

BRITNEY SPEARS COCK SUCKING VIDEO---EXCLUSIVE!!!

19 messages 2001/10/08

[#22257] [Newbie] Switching from Perl : suffling — Damien WYART <damien.wyart@...>

Dear All,

13 messages 2001/10/08

[#22299] Re: Less than 4 days now... — Andrew Hunt <andy@...>

>> Is everyone ready for the

27 messages 2001/10/09
[#22300] Re: Less than 4 days now... — Robert Feldt <feldt@...> 2001/10/09

Hi,

[#22310] Re: Less than 4 days now... — Dave Thomas <Dave@...> 2001/10/09

"Hal E. Fulton" <hal9000@hypermetrics.com> writes:

[#22316] Re: Less than 4 days now... — Todd Gillespie <toddg@...> 2001/10/09

On Tue, 9 Oct 2001, Dave Thomas wrote:

[#22320] Re: Less than 4 days now... — Dave Thomas <Dave@...> 2001/10/09

Todd Gillespie <toddg@mail.ma.utexas.edu> writes:

[#22347] Re: Less than 4 days now... — Robert Feldt <feldt@...> 2001/10/09

On Wed, 10 Oct 2001, Dave Thomas wrote:

[#22325] blocks with min and max — Mark Slagell <ms@...>

I don't know if this has been raised before, but I'd like to be able to

17 messages 2001/10/09

[#22405] list comprehensions alike Python ??? — markus jais <info@...>

hello

20 messages 2001/10/10
[#22407] Re: list comprehensions alike Python ??? — Robert Feldt <feldt@...> 2001/10/10

On Thu, 11 Oct 2001, markus jais wrote:

[#22411] Re: list comprehensions alike Python ??? — Paul Prescod <paul@...> 2001/10/11

Robert Feldt wrote:

[#22432] OSSL opinion — Michal Rokos <rokosm@...>

Hello!

16 messages 2001/10/11

[#22465] Learn Ruby/Tk or Ruby/GTK? && Problems with these. — "dAHen" <steensland@...>

Hi!

45 messages 2001/10/12
[#22472] Re: Learn Ruby/Tk or Ruby/GTK? && Problems with these. — "dAHen" <steensland@...> 2001/10/12

ts> No, you just need to have the header files and libraries for tcl/tk and

[#22520] Re: Learn Ruby/Tk or Ruby/GTK? — Kevin Smith <kevinbsmith@...> 2001/10/14

--- dAHen <steensland@hotmail.com> wrote:

[#22613] Re: Learn Ruby/Tk or Ruby/GTK? — stesch@... (Stefan Scholl) 2001/10/16

On 2001-10-15 19:58:29Z, Christopher Sawtell <csawtell@paradise.net.nz> wrote:

[#22625] Re: Learn Ruby/Tk or Ruby/GTK? — Kevin Smith <kevinbsmith@...> 2001/10/16

--- Stefan Scholl <stesch@no-spoon.de> wrote:

[#22632] Re: Learn Ruby/Tk or Ruby/GTK? — "Mark Hahn" <mchahn@...> 2001/10/16

[#22645] What about FLTK? — "Mark Hahn" <mchahn@...> 2001/10/16

[#22652] Re: What about FLTK? — Kevin Smith <kevinbsmith@...> 2001/10/17

--- Mark Hahn <mchahn@facelink.com> wrote:

[#22656] Re: What about FLTK? — "Mark Hahn" <mchahn@...> 2001/10/17

That's good to know. It makes me more comfortable to proceed assuming FLTK.

[#22494] extracting from delimited text files — Albert Wagner <alwagner@...>

What is the simplist way to extract fields from standard quoted, comma

23 messages 2001/10/13
[#22496] Re: extracting from delimited text files — Robert Linder <robert_linder_2000@...> 2001/10/13

Check out http://ruby.yi.org/raa/en/all.html

[#22502] Open-ended ranges — Sean Russell <ser@...>

Before I post an RCR on this, I'd like to solicit information from the more

11 messages 2001/10/14
[#22503] Re: Open-ended ranges — Robert Feldt <feldt@...> 2001/10/14

On Sun, 14 Oct 2001, Sean Russell wrote:

[#22766] ANN: RuEdit - introspective Ruby editor — phlip_cpp@... (Phlip)

Here's the README file from http://sourceforge.net/projects/ruedit :

31 messages 2001/10/19

[#22769] How to Convert String to Regex to Perform Exact Match — William Djaja Tjokroaminata <billtj@...>

Hi,

10 messages 2001/10/19

[#22867] RE: I need some help!! — Mikkel Bruun <mikkel.bruun@...>

uhhmm...

14 messages 2001/10/21
[#22883] Re: I need some help!! — Tobias Reif <tobiasreif@...> 2001/10/21

Mikkel Bruun wrote:

[#22886] Re: I need some help!! — "Avdi B. Grimm" <avdi@...> 2001/10/21

On Sun, 2001-10-21 at 15:26, Tobias Reif wrote:

[#22871] Preaching Ruby to the masses. How? — Kent Dahl <kentda@...>

Hi.

17 messages 2001/10/21

[#23063] Bruce Eckel's opinion of Ruby — "Rich Kilmer" <rich@...>

Ouch!

178 messages 2001/10/23
[#23076] Re: Bruce Eckel's opinion of Ruby — Eric Lee Green <eric@...> 2001/10/23

On Tuesday 23 October 2001 11:20, you wrote:

[#23084] Re: Bruce Eckel's opinion of Ruby — Michael Neumann <neumann@...> 2001/10/23

Eric Lee Green wrote:

[#23087] Re: Bruce Eckel's opinion of Ruby — Eric Lee Green <eric@...> 2001/10/23

On Tuesday 23 October 2001 13:25, you wrote:

[#23088] Re: Bruce Eckel's opinion of Ruby — Robert Feldt <feldt@...> 2001/10/23

On Wed, 24 Oct 2001, Eric Lee Green wrote:

[#23096] Re: Bruce Eckel's opinion of Ruby — "Rich Kilmer" <rich@...> 2001/10/23

[#23099] Re: Bruce Eckel's opinion of Ruby — Robert Feldt <feldt@...> 2001/10/23

On Wed, 24 Oct 2001, Rich Kilmer wrote:

[#23090] Re: Bruce Eckel's opinion of Ruby — Paul Brannan <pbrannan@...> 2001/10/23

On Wed, 24 Oct 2001, Michael Neumann wrote:

[#23085] Re: Bruce Eckel's opinion of Ruby — Robert Feldt <feldt@...> 2001/10/23

Hi Eric and thanks for your detailed comments,

[#23119] Re: Bruce Eckel's opinion of Ruby — Sean Russell <ser@...> 2001/10/23

Eric Lee Green wrote:

[#23141] Re: Bruce Eckel's opinion of Ruby — Emiliano <emile@...> 2001/10/24

Sean Russell wrote:

[#23219] Re: Bruce Eckel's opinion of Ruby — Sean Russell <ser@...> 2001/10/24

Emiliano wrote:

[#23221] Re: Bruce Eckel's opinion of Ruby — Emiliano <emile@...> 2001/10/24

Sean Russell wrote:

[#23259] Re: Bruce Eckel's opinion of Ruby — Sean Russell <ser@...> 2001/10/25

Emiliano wrote:

[#23264] Re: Bruce Eckel's opinion of Ruby — Emiliano <emile@...> 2001/10/25

Sean Russell wrote:

[#23439] Re: Issues with white space [was Re: Bruce Eckel's opinion of Ruby] — Sean Russell <ser@...> 2001/10/26

Raja S. wrote:

[#23447] Re: Issues with white space [was Re: Bruce Eckel's opinion of Ruby] — ts <decoux@...> 2001/10/26

>>>>> "S" == Sean Russell <ser@efn.org> writes:

[#23108] Re: Bruce Eckel's opinion of Ruby — Sean Russell <ser@...> 2001/10/23

Emiliano wrote:

[#23214] () vs (...) in header files — Paul Brannan <pbrannan@...>

There is a serious problem with including ruby.h and intern.h in C++

14 messages 2001/10/24
[#23283] Re: () vs (...) in header files — ts <decoux@...> 2001/10/25

>>>>> "P" == Paul Brannan <pbrannan@atdesk.com> writes:

[#23248] [ANN] RubyInRubyParser 0.1-pre-alpha — markus liedl <markus.lado@...>

53 messages 2001/10/25
[#23323] Re: [ANN] RubyInRubyParser 0.1-pre-alpha — ptkwt@...1.aracnet.com (Phil Tomson) 2001/10/25

In article <5.1.0.14.0.20011025083950.00bc30b0@mercury.sabren.com>,

[#23336] Re: [ANN] RubyInRubyParser 0.1-pre-alpha — Jimmy Thrasher <jjthrash@...> 2001/10/25

At 02:54 AM 10/26/2001 +0900, you wrote:

[#23350] Re: GUI / was [ANN] RubyInRubyParser 0.1-pre-alpha — markus liedl <markus.lado@...> 2001/10/25

> having a native window with a canvas which Ruby draws on using the BitBlt

[#23355] Re: GUI / was [ANN] RubyInRubyParser 0.1-pre-alpha — "Rich Kilmer" <rich@...> 2001/10/25

I wrote a sophisticated lightweight component framework on Java (before Swing) that was very fast. Of course, writing it in a "higher level" language adds overhead, but not as much overhead as bad design ;-) If you could have low-level primitives written natively and layer higher level constructs with Ruby, I think you could build a very responsive UI.

[#23369] Re: GUI / was [ANN] RubyInRubyParser 0.1-pre-alpha — Eli Green <eli.green@...> 2001/10/25

I never understood why Swing was so slow. I do know, however, that Swing is

[#23371] Re: GUI / was [ANN] RubyInRubyParser 0.1-pre-alpha — Avi Bryant <avi@...4.com> 2001/10/25

On Fri, 26 Oct 2001, Eli Green wrote:

[#23261] Ruby macros — Leo <lraz@...>

Hi Ruby experts,

19 messages 2001/10/25

[#23318] class Foo does not call Class.new? — Brian Marick <marick@...>

It seems that this:

25 messages 2001/10/25
[#23358] Re: class Foo does not call Class.new? — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2001/10/25

Hi,

[#23360] Re: class Foo does not call Class.new? — David Alan Black <dblack@...> 2001/10/25

Hello --

[#23395] Re: class Foo does not call Class.new? — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2001/10/26

Hi,

[#23680] Re: ref. constructors and new (was: Re: class Foo does not call Class.new?) — David Alan Black <dblack@...> 2001/10/28

Hello --

[#23396] Ruby and Python: a fuzzy question — Dave Thomas <Dave@...>

37 messages 2001/10/26
[#23406] Re: Ruby and Python: a fuzzy question — "F. GEIGER" <fgeiger@...> 2001/10/26

Python and Ruby both are write/read scripting languages, which are in one or

[#23544] Fast reply needed: class var trouble — Robert Feldt <feldt@...>

Ok its getting late over here in sweden and I'm tired. Can someone please

21 messages 2001/10/26
[#23548] RE: Fast reply needed: class var trouble — "Rich Kilmer" <rich@...> 2001/10/26

[#23555] Re: Fast reply needed: class var trouble — Robert Feldt <feldt@...> 2001/10/26

On Sat, 27 Oct 2001, Rich Kilmer wrote:

[#23557] Re: Fast reply needed: class var trouble — "Rich Kilmer" <rich@...> 2001/10/26

because you defined:

[#23558] Re: Fast reply needed: class var trouble — Robert Feldt <feldt@...> 2001/10/26

On Sat, 27 Oct 2001, Rich Kilmer wrote:

[#23561] Re: Fast reply needed: class var trouble — "Ralph Mason" <ralph.mason@...> 2001/10/26

I would rather have the option to require declaration of all variables.

[#23619] sleeping, calling methods inside class defs — Tobias Reif <tobiasreif@...>

ruby 1.6.3 (2001-03-19) [i386-cygwin]

15 messages 2001/10/27
[#23621] Re: sleeping, calling methods inside class defs — David Alan Black <dblack@...> 2001/10/27

Hello --

[#23658] How to get a String to interpolate itself? — ptkwt@...1.aracnet.com (Phil Tomson)

11 messages 2001/10/28

[#23668] Ruby's use of cygwin and commercial use! — Sunil Hadap <hadap@...>

Hi,

23 messages 2001/10/28
[#23865] Re: Ruby's use of cygwin and commercial use! — "Benoit Cerrina" <benoit.cerrina@...> 2001/10/30

[#23866] Overiding a method in another module — "Mark Hahn" <mchahn@...> 2001/10/30

I want to write a module that overrides a method in another module. I have

[#23885] RE: Overiding a method in another module — "Mark Hahn" <mchahn@...> 2001/10/31

[#23893] Re: Overiding a method in another module — David Alan Black <dblack@...> 2001/10/31

Hello --

[#23713] Some inspirations from REBOL — Robert Feldt <feldt@...>

Hi,

42 messages 2001/10/29
[#23735] RE: Some inspirations from REBOL — "Ryan Leavengood" <mrcode@...> 2001/10/29

> However, it's got some nice properties that my friend has been

[#23738] Re: Some inspirations from REBOL — Michael Neumann <neumann@...> 2001/10/29

Ryan Leavengood wrote:

[#23764] Re: Some inspirations from REBOL — Robert Feldt <feldt@...> 2001/10/29

On Tue, 30 Oct 2001, Ryan Leavengood wrote:

[#23769] RubyGems Status (was: Re: Some inspirations from REBOL) — "Ryan Leavengood" <mrcode@...> 2001/10/29

> Any news on RubyGems? I'm not pushing you just wanting a status report

[#23773] Re: RubyGems Status (was: Re: Some inspirations from REBOL) — Robert Feldt <feldt@...> 2001/10/29

On Tue, 30 Oct 2001, Ryan Leavengood wrote:

[#23779] Re: RubyGems Status (was: Re: Some inspirations from REBOL) — "Ryan Leavengood" <mrcode@...> 2001/10/29

> Release to CVS as quickly as possible!

[#23783] Re: RubyGems Status (was: Re: Some inspirations from REBOL) — Robert Feldt <feldt@...> 2001/10/29

On Tue, 30 Oct 2001, Ryan Leavengood wrote:

[#23786] Re: RubyGems Status (was: Re: Some inspirations from REBOL) — Neil Conway <nconway@...> 2001/10/30

On Mon, 2001-10-29 at 18:56, Robert Feldt wrote:

[#23793] Re: RubyGems Status (was: Re: Someinspirations from REBOL) — "Rich Kilmer" <rich@...> 2001/10/30

OK...here's an idea for making a Gem a Ruby executable file...

[#23768] RCR: Fun with attribute shortcuts solves RCR #3 and more — Gunnar Andersson <dff180@...>

Hi everyone, remember this?

19 messages 2001/10/29

[#23868] Re: Ruby's use of cygwin and commercial use! — Andrew Hunt <andy@...>

Benoit says:

14 messages 2001/10/30

[#23876] New RubyGarden Poll: Windows support — Dave Thomas <Dave@...>

28 messages 2001/10/30
[#23891] Re: New RubyGarden Poll: Windows support — "Nat Pryce" <nat.pryce@...13media.com> 2001/10/31

Please! Don't vote for what you think will win. Vote for what you actually

[#23896] Re: New RubyGarden Poll: Windows support — "Curt Hibbs" <curt@...> 2001/10/31

What would MinGW buy us over straight MSVC? Since MinGW ultimately uses the

[#23915] Re: New RubyGarden Poll: Windows support — ptkwt@...1.aracnet.com (Phil Tomson) 2001/10/31

In article <NCBBJBPADKGIOFLDNEALMEHKFFAA.curt@hibbs.com>,

[#23882] RubyGems Discussion — "Ryan Leavengood" <RyanL@...>

Wow, there has been a lot of discussion related to RubyGems over the

19 messages 2001/10/30

[#23904] Test::Unit = Lapidary + RubyUnit — "Nathaniel Talbott" <ntalbott@...>

I've been in discussions with Masaki Suketa and Ken McKinlay about the

12 messages 2001/10/31

[#23959] Creating charts from Ruby — Robert Feldt <feldt@...>

Hi,

16 messages 2001/10/31

[ruby-talk:23440] GUI for Ruby

From: Chris Grindstaff <chrisg@...>
Date: 2001-10-26 13:40:28 UTC
List: ruby-talk #23440
My background:

I've written software on several flavors of Smalltalk: VisualAge
Smalltalk (native widgets on many many platforms), VisualWorks
Smalltalk (emulated widgets on even more platforms), Squeak (emulated
widgets probably on the most platforms).  I even ported Squeak to DOS
several years ago just to learn more about the VM.

I think there is a natural tension between emulated GUI frameworks
where anything is possible and native GUI frameworks that look
"natural" and someone else has written for you or supports.
Emulated frameworks like Squeak allow you to experiment with
completely new concepts.  They empower you because you control all the
bits.

That's also the biggest downside to emulated widgets, you control all
the bits. The big advantage of native GUI frameworks is you're
leveraging the huge investment that Microsoft, KDE, Motif, etc has
made in their native widgets. I also tend to think users prefer using
something they're use. But the bigger issue is not "reinventing the
wheel" or better yet, "supporting the wheel". Performance is another
advantage of native frameworks - again MS and company work hard to
make their widgets fast.

I've not really seen a system that does both native and emulated
widgets well as Jimmy Thrasher mentioned. I suspect that you have a
better chance of adding an emulated framework to an existing native
framework. Going from emulated to native is rarely possible if your
emulated framework is worth much (see Squeak as an example).

I hadn't seen anyone mention OTI's (Object Technology International)
latest work on Eclipse. A short history on OTI. OTI has been doing
objects for a very long time. Starting in 1988 they wrote a version of
Smalltalk that IBM eventually bought(the company too), creating
VisualAge for Smalltalk and VisualAge for Java. Around when Java
really started taking off OTI switched to focusing on Java. Recently
they released their new IDE framework called Eclipse. Eclipse has many
interesting things in it but pertinent to this discussion they have
some interesting ideas on native widgets.

Their new native widget framework is called SWT.  I nice write up of
the framework and how it's portable is provided here.
http://www.eclipsecorner.org/articles/Article-SWT-Design-1/SWT-Design-1.html

Eclipse and the SWT framework are in the process of being
open-sourced.  Currently SWT runs on Windows and Linux with ports being
discussed to the MacOS.

I mostly point this out for several reasons:

  1. To recommend SWT as a possible native Ruby GUI
  toolkit.  I'm pretty confident that if you know Java, porting SWT would
  not be difficult because of their architecture.

  2. There are some interesting ideas in the design doc above.

  3. To mention that Eclipse is intended to be used as a IDE toolkit
  and as such I think Eclipse could be used to build a great Ruby IDE.

My 2 cents,
Chris
-- 
Chris Grindstaff
chrisg@appliedReasoning.com  |  www.appliedReasoning.com

In This Thread

Prev Next