From: Wilson Bilkovich Date: 2007-01-15T02:35:15+09:00 Subject: Re: possible to un-warn? On 1/14/07, David Chelimsky wrote: > Hi all, > > I'm working on implementing expectation matchers in rspec, so instead of this: > > cat.should_eat "tuna" > > you would write this: > > cat.should eat "tuna" > > Now the rub is that this generates "warning: parenthesize argument(s) > for future version". The thing is that, in this case, we know with > some certainty that everything after "eat" is an argument to "eat", > and that the result of "eat" is an argument to "should". > > I'd like the ability to be able to tell the interpreter that this is > intentional and to not warn in this case, and I don't want to > accomplish this by turning off all warnings. Is this doable? Does this > strike anybody as nuts? If so, please explain. > > The reason I want to do this is that I've run this new syntax by a few > people. Those who write a lot of ruby (not necessarily rails) are > perfectly happy writing it like this: > > cat.should eat("tuna") #produces no warning > > But, those who write a lot of ruby on rails, not so much. The parens > are not railsy. > > In the end, using matchers is a much more flexible and maintainable > approach to expectations, so it's likely that it will become "the > way". The question is whether we can keep all the rails developers who > are already using rspec happy without having to maintain two methods > to achieve the same goal. > Unfortunately this happens in parse.y, without any conditional code around it. To my knowledge, there is no way to disable the warning without recompiling Ruby.