From: markus liedl <markus.lado@...>
Date: 2001-10-26T08:19:56+09:00
Subject: [ruby-talk:23376] Re: [ANN] RubyInRubyParser 0.1-pre-alpha

> In article <15926.1003989197@www27.gmx.net>,
> markus liedl  <markus.lado@gmx.de> wrote:
> >
> >> Is the intent for this to eventually lead to a Ruby VM written in Ruby?
> >> 
> >
> >Yes, sooner or later. The last few weeks I passed in learning Lisp and
> >Smalltalk. I'm not sure which one may be better suited: VM written in
> Lisp, or
> >modified Smalltalk VM. But surely both are easier to handle than a VM in
> C.
> >
> [snip]
> >Another idea I followed some time, is to 'missuse' GCC as JIT compiler, 
> 
> How might this be done?  
> 
> >but there are some problems:
> >* copyright / there will never be a libgcc
> 
> Why would there be copyright issues?  gcc is under GPL. 
> 
> Phil
> 


http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/1999-12/msg00536.html
Subject: Converting the gcc backend to a library? 
From: Mikael Djurfeldt <mdj at mdj dot nada dot kth dot se>

 ...
 ... technically interesting discussion 
 ...

http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2000-01/msg00572.html

Subject: Re: Converting the gcc backend to a library? 
From: Richard Stallman <rms at gnu dot org> 

-- 
-------------------------------------------------