From: Nathaniel Talbott <ntalbott@...>
Date: 2007-01-12T22:34:57+09:00
Subject: Re: Tattle - The Ruby Census

On 1/12/07, Jeremy McAnally <jeremymcanally@gmail.com> wrote:

> But the question is would the hoe developers use this?  They seem
> fairly stuck on this whole idempotentence kick.

As far as I'm concerned, optional dependencies preserve idempotency,
and based on Eric's earlier statements on this thread, he seems to
agree. If we get optional dependencies in Rubygems and hoe doesn't
become optional, then I'll start clamoring, too :-)


-- 
Nathaniel Talbott

<:((><