From: ts <decoux@...>
Date: 2001-10-26T00:44:39+09:00
Subject: [ruby-talk:23309] Re: () vs (...) in header files

>>>>> "P" == Paul Brannan <pbrannan@atdesk.com> writes:

P> Prototypes that I am most concerned about are those for functions that I
P> might actually call from an extension (I do not trust myself to always get
P> my arguments correct).  This includes any prototype found in a header
P> file (particularly ruby.h and intern.h, but also st.h, regex.h, and
P> util.h).

 Well, it was never defined which functions can be called from an
 extension. Perhaps these functions must first be defined. I don't know if
 matz is really interested in doing this (this is fastidious, not really
 interesting, ...)



Guy Decoux