From: dblack@...
Date: 2007-01-04T06:53:25+09:00
Subject: Re: Little Things

Hi --

On Thu, 4 Jan 2007, Robert Dober wrote:

> (2) OT but still interesting I feel it might be a good convention that any
> method changing the object should have a ! suffix, would make
>    programs much more readable, don't you think?

No.  I would not want to see pop turned into pop! or << turned into
<<! and so forth.


David

-- 
Q. What is THE Ruby book for Rails developers?
A. RUBY FOR RAILS by David A. Black (http://www.manning.com/black)
    (See what readers are saying!  http://www.rubypal.com/r4rrevs.pdf)
Q. Where can I get Ruby/Rails on-site training, consulting, coaching?
A. Ruby Power and Light, LLC (http://www.rubypal.com)