From: Wilson Bilkovich <wilsonb@...>
Date: 2007-01-04T00:53:40+09:00
Subject: Re: Status of Cardinal (was Re: Proposal to create a new mailing list)

On 1/3/07, M. Edward (Ed) Borasky <znmeb@cesmail.net> wrote:
> Robert Dober wrote:
> > On 1/3/07, Martin DeMello <martindemello@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> <snip>
> >>
> >> http://www.oreillynet.com/onlamp/blog/2005/10/ofun.html is indicative.
> >
> >
> > What a great link!!!!!
> > Thx a lot for sharing.
> > <snip>
> Yeah ... fun is definitely a compelling business reason for moving from
> subversion to Darcs. So -- is there any chance that Perl 6 will become a
> dialect of Haskell rather than a rewrite of Perl?
>
> And who has more fun -- Ruby programmers or Haskell programmers?
>

In Rubinius, fun is an object, just like stack frames and CPUs.