From: Ned Konz <ned@...>
Date: 2001-10-25T03:31:17+09:00
Subject: [ruby-talk:23215] Re: rb_protect_inspect

On Wednesday 24 October 2001 11:21 am, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:
> Hi,
>
> In message "[ruby-talk:23210] Re: rb_protect_inspect"
>
>     on 01/10/25, Ned Konz <ned@bike-nomad.com> writes:
> |This is why Matz should consider moving to ANSI C function definitions and
> |ditch the old style ones...
> |
> |The old arguments about some compilers not handling ANSI C aren't valid
> | any more, are they (for platforms that anyone wants to run Ruby on)?
>
> Can we now ignore Sun's old cc?  Maybe.
> Hmm, I'm loosing my excuse...
>
> 							matz.

GCC 2.95 build status:

sparc-sun-solaris2.4
 Successful 

sparc-sun-solaris2.5
 Successful 

sparc-sun-solaris2.5.1
 Successful 

sparc-sun-solaris2.6
 Successful 

sparc-sun-solaris2.7
 Successful 

sparc-sun-solaris2.8
 Successful 

sparc-sun-solaris2.* (64 bits)
 Not supported 

sparc-sun-sunos4.1.3
 Successful 

sparc-sun-sunos4.1.4
 Successful 

sparc-unknown-linux-gnu
 Successful 

Is this enough? Is Ruby supported on any Sun platforms other than these right 
now?

-- 
Ned Konz
currently: Stanwood, WA
email:     ned@bike-nomad.com
homepage:  http://bike-nomad.com