From: Robert Feldt <feldt@...>
Date: 2001-10-24T23:35:41+09:00
Subject: [ruby-talk:23198] Re: Bruce Eckel's opinion of Ruby [SmallScript/AOS Selector Namespaces]

On Wed, 24 Oct 2001, David Simmons wrote:

> Basically. But I probably should make sure we really are saying the same
> thing.
> 
> It is important to recognize that the <Foo> described in all my prior
> examples is and always remains (as these prior examples were written) a
> member of the namespace A defined by module A.
> 
> <snip>
>
This was very clear, thank you David. Sounds really useful if current 
semantics is still allowed (changes are system-wide). Any comments
from matz, Dave and the other gurus?

/Robert