From: Mat Schaffer <schapht@...>
Date: 2006-12-28T05:26:42+09:00
Subject: Re: Using an UnboundMethod instead of an alias to redefine a method


On Dec 27, 2006, at 2:08 PM, ara.t.howard@noaa.gov wrote:

> On Thu, 28 Dec 2006, Trans wrote:
>
>> Hmm....
>>
>>  defs.push 'foo' do
>>    ...
>>  end
>>
>>  defs.pop
>
> i like that.  anyone else?

Brain storming:

- Wouldn't it make more sense to say defs.pop 'foo' ?
- If I can say defs.X, then what's defs?  Is it an object I can do  
other stuff with?
- How about injecting a redefinition somewhere other than the top of  
the stack?

I mean, the basic implementation is plenty cool.  Just thought I'd  
share my crazy ideas....
-Mat