From: John Wilger Date: 2006-12-22T14:30:04+09:00 Subject: Re: does Ruby generate WINDOWS and dialog boxes? On Dec 21, 2:46 pm, David Vallner wrote: > John Wilger wrote: > > Most likely, I would > > go with something like Flex[1] for the client, since it's relatively > > painless to distribute upgrades that way.Mind you, this is what I said in my first reply to Richard in the first > place and then went along with the idea. I didn't say the architecture > is an ideal one or one I would pick, just not without redeeming value of > -some sort-. OK, I must have just missed that post. This thread has about two or three topics in it, and I was only half following it when I decided to speak up on that architecture. I went back and skimmed through it to make sure I wasn't saying something that was already said, but I didn't re-read every single post closely. Apologies if I offended.