From: James Britt Date: 2006-12-22T06:13:11+09:00 Subject: Re: Ruby's Trac Alternative Michael Greenly wrote: > Bil Kleb wrote: >> So I'm trying to use Trac for our FUN3D development, >> as an experiment for a potential NASA-wide installation, >> but Trac is not the easiest thing to get setup. Lately, >> I've even had to hack some of the Python internals to >> get syntax highlighting working via enscript. >> >> I recently read that the Rails-based alternative, Collaboa >> (http://collaboa.org/) is on the move again, but I can't >> even see code. >> >> What's up? >> >> Thanks, > > What system were you installing this on? I've always found Trac very > easy to setup and stable to use. Same here. Well, after all the fsck'n Python dependencies are in place. :) But I've had more issues installing svn than Trac. I've started assembling some Ruby helper scripts for certain tasks (creating a new Trac project; modifying user permissions) but still find Trac best-of-breed. But it's been a while since I've looked at Collaboa (which, at the time, was a poor runner-up to Trac). (Trac + darcs would be sweet, but as far as I can tell it is only really doable through an svn-sync hack.) -- James Britt http://www.ruby-doc.org - Ruby Help & Documentation http://beginningruby.com - Beginning Ruby: The Online Book http://www.rubystuff.com - The Ruby Store for Ruby Stuff http://www.jamesbritt.com - Playing with Better Toys