From: Andrea Fazzi <andrea.fazzi@...>
Date: 2006-12-19T02:27:29+09:00
Subject: Re: item order in Object#methods

Gavin Kistner wrote:
> From: Andrea Fazzi [mailto:andrea.fazzi@alca.le.it] 
>   
>> Rob Biedenharn wrote:
>>     
>>> If it's important, why not sort them first:
>>>    self.methods.sort.collect { ... }
>>>       
>> Because I'm interested to the methods' definition order 
>> inside the class 
>> not to the alphabetical order of methods' name. The names init_1, 
>> init_2, etc. were just an example.
>>     
>
> I'm moderately sure that Ruby doesn't internally keep track of the order
> in which classes were defined, or the order in which methods are added
> to them. But that doesn't mean you can't do it yourself with a little
> bit of work.
>
>   

Thank you Gavin, your implementation solved my problem!
I like very very much your solution! :-)

Thanks again.
Andrea