From: Richard Date: 2006-12-18T05:20:07+09:00 Subject: Re: does Ruby generate WINDOWS and dialog boxes? > Odds are it Just Won't unless you only > render in IE with high security privileges and abuse ActiveX with > reckless abandon. A client's WindowsXP machine, for the purpose of running a Rails-based app, will have Firefox running and invoke the app with http://localhost:3000, which will be serviced by WEBrick, a Ruby-based web server, and supported by a publicly available database-server like MySQL. No ActiveX nor security risks. But plenty of Ajax. > As I'm generally not a fan of the heinous crimes committed in the name of > Ajax, I'd have to see the result for that to happen. I'll have an example on a website in a month. > Most of the > in-browser desktop mockups make me ask why not use Java Web Start / > ClickOnce / Flex anyway? IMHO, Ruby + Rails is a far superior way to build both desktop and web apps. Java is, too my taste, a lousy C++, which I felt is the most elegant programming language ever. But I've come to see that Ruby is the most economical yet powerful (in terms of programmer effort) languages ever. Of course, I'm not really qualified to make such judgments, despite 40+ years of professional programming experience with IBM mainframe assembler, Fortran, and Cobol to desktop Visual C++. I see by your disdain of some aspects of the current state of affairs that you've thought a lot about some of these issues, so I'm interested in knowing whether you're more sanguine about the Firefox-Ruby-Rails-WEBrick-MySQL environment. As I said, I'll have a sample app up in a month or so housed on a website that supports Ruby-Rails-MySQL apps. If you wish, send me an email indicating your interest and I'll respond with URL, user-name and password when it's ready. Right now I'm toying with the idea of posting a small reward to anyone who can crack the web app and email me selected content from it (sort of a poor man's way of tests done on the DES, as I recall). Best wishes, Richard Muller