From: Robert Klemme <shortcutter@...>
Date: 2006-12-07T21:15:05+09:00
Subject: Re: join_with

On 07.12.2006 12:56, Martin DeMello wrote:
> On 12/7/06, Vincent Fourmond <vincent.fourmond@9online.fr> wrote:
>>
>>   I vote for this function, although the name, join_with, really isn't
>> telling what it's doing (it doesn't speak to me, unlike most ruby method
>> names).
> 
> I've settled on Enumerable#jmap in my personal code - it fits my
> thinking, because I'm focusing on the map, and the join is secondary.

The I'd spent at least three or four more characters - your current 
naming lets me think of some javaism. :-)

	robert