From: Vincent Fourmond Date: 2006-12-07T20:50:50+09:00 Subject: Re: join_with Martin DeMello wrote: > On 12/6/06, Robert Klemme wrote: >> Having said that I'd prefer a more efficient implementation: > > Definitely - I just posted the code to explain what I wanted the > method to do. Note that an added advantage is that you needn't create > the temporary array for the map step. I vote for this function, although the name, join_with, really isn't telling what it's doing (it doesn't speak to me, unlike most ruby method names). Vince -- Vincent Fourmond, PhD student http://vincent.fourmond.neuf.fr/