From: Jason Roelofs <jameskilton@...>
Date: 2006-12-07T01:14:04+09:00
Subject: Re: What's the current standing of Rant vs. Rake?

------=_Part_32010_33463562.1165421640973
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

So, I've looked around Rant's documentation, and frankly I can't see
anything that's much different than Rake, outside of a few functions that
definitely would be easy to integrate into Rake (gen, etc). What is better
about Rant and why don't the two projects just merge? Seems like a waste of
time to create two very similar projects just because one doesn't have a
feature or two.

Jason

On 12/6/06, Bil Kleb <Bil.Kleb@nasa.gov> wrote:
>
> Daniel Berger wrote:
> >
> > If there's a compelling reason to switch, then people will switch.  If
> > not, they won't.
>
> The ol' Beckhard-Gleicher model of change:
>
>   change if dissatisfaction * appeal * plan > cost_of_change
>
> See also Moore's /Crossing the Chasm/.
>
> Later,
> --
> Bil Kleb
> http://kleb.tadalist.com/lists/public/427170
>
>

------=_Part_32010_33463562.1165421640973--