From: Trans Date: 2006-11-25T04:49:36+09:00 Subject: Re: New RCRchive, including new process dblack@wobblini.net wrote: > Hi everyone -- > > The new RCRchive has gone live, at http://www.rcrchive.net. > > Please note the following important points: > > * We're starting again, and it's for Ruby 1.9/2.0 requests only. > * Yes, I know it's not a design masterpiece :-) If you're a > good designer and want to volunteer to help, let me know. > * Comments are no longer entered on-site. Instead, there will > be a mailing list for each RCR. > * Once you've signed up, you can: > - submit RCRs > - vote on RCRs > - subscribe to one or more of the comment/discussion mailing > lists > > More help is available at the site, and I'm happy to field questions > and problem reports (subject to holiday schedule :-) What's the difference? (Besides the fact that everyone's work and comments on RCR's prior has now been trashed.) The submit form looks the same. I don't see any mention of the "mailing lists". I even had to re-register. I don't get it. Rather the rejuvenate the RCR process in any way, I this is driving the death nail through it. With all this, who wants to bother anymore? Personally I think the whole idea of mailing list for _each RCR_ is too much. No one's going to take the time to join a mailing list for a single RCR. Very few people ever commented on the RCRs as it was. I mean really. Is this just some way to shut people up without being mean? Sort of Honey-pot for wantabe language designers? If Matz and core team were really interested in ideas for Ruby 2 from the community, a dedicated mailing list would be the thing to have. A place where ideas can be hashed out. If bad, they'd die quickly. If reasonable, Matz or whomever could encourage a formal submission --at least then one would know their hard RCR work was going to at least get carefully looked at. Anyhow that's my 2 cents. T. BTW, I submitted an RCR and RCRchive bombed.