From: David Vallner <david@...>
Date: 2006-11-20T00:59:50+09:00
Subject: Re: Ruby vs Java vs c++

--------------enig555EDDC25A68A8DDD3E0DDA7
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Phlip wrote:
>> however, speaking to one my programmer friends who is a top level Java=

>> programmer (the stuff he writes is very efficient and fancy as
>> well--great balance),
>=20
> Oh, I love it when they start lecturing you on how awesome that peesash=
it=20
> language is! Ay-yi-yi!
>=20

[snip]

> If I did that using any system besides Ruby (on Rails, and pure Test Dr=
iven=20
> Development), I would be absolutely screwed. Instead, I am able to fix =
the=20
> cost of each iteration, while keeping the quality as high as possible, =

> without excessive delays.
>=20

I am so glad to see the ranting preaching zealot was refuted with a
factually supported statement based on experience with comparable problem=
s.

David Vallner


--------------enig555EDDC25A68A8DDD3E0DDA7
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc"

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (MingW32)

iD8DBQFFYH9sy6MhrS8astoRAq2MAJ0frTVGlEGQUomdgOQ0zV7xjGWh4QCeK1Tl
HmMlcYbt75b139rvgCCD++U=
=3ubj
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--------------enig555EDDC25A68A8DDD3E0DDA7--