From: Roseanne Zhang Date: 2006-11-19T14:43:10+09:00 Subject: Re: Ruby vs Java vs c++ Roseanne Zhang wrote: > Everybody here or somewhere else take that for granted: Java is slower > than C++, but actually that is not true. > > I thought so too. However, my computational heavy practice proved, to > certain extent, otherwise. I should have said: Everybody here or somewhere else take that for granted: Java is slower than C++, but actually that is not ALWAYS true. -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.