From: spooq <spoooq@...>
Date: 2006-11-17T20:53:22+09:00
Subject: Re: #returning and #tap

On 11/17/06, Martin DeMello <martindemello@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 11/17/06, spooq <spoooq@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Actually, how about giving the proc a copy of the object, rather than
> > the real deal?
> >
> > class Object
> >   def tap
> >     yield self.dup
> >     self
> >   end
> > end
>
> Thought of that, but not everything responds to dup (nil and symbols, e.g.)

Can those cases be worked around?