From: Martin DeMello <martindemello@...>
Date: 2006-11-17T20:49:01+09:00
Subject: Re: #returning and #tap

On 11/17/06, spooq <spoooq@gmail.com> wrote:
> Actually, how about giving the proc a copy of the object, rather than
> the real deal?
>
> class Object
>   def tap
>     yield self.dup
>     self
>   end
> end

Thought of that, but not everything responds to dup (nil and symbols, e.g.)

m.