From: ts <decoux@...>
Date: 2001-10-12T20:50:00+09:00
Subject: [ruby-talk:22463] Re: REXML

>>>>> "T" == Tobias Reif <tobiasreif@pinkjuice.com> writes:

T> bench.rb [...] nqxml_bench.rb [...] flatbench.rb [...] nqxml_flatbench.rb

T> Thanks, but I'm trying to achive the same task my NQXML program carries 
T> out (merging 2 subtrees into one main tree) with REXML. I'm not 
T> interested in benchmarks, but in seeing how REXML works for my tasks, 
T> ease of use-, elegance-, and well-formedness- wise, not speed wise. Or 
T> did I miss your point?

 The scripts do the same thing, but one written with REXML and the other
 with NQXML. If you compare the 2 scripts you can know how to translate
 NQXML in REXML.


Guy Decoux