From: David Vallner <david@...>
Date: 2006-11-11T21:48:14+09:00
Subject: Re: Rails vs. Asp.Net politics

--------------enig201D7B903353C52D2F273948
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Matt Lawrence wrote:
> ASP.NET limits you to running on Windows.  Rails runs well on Windows,
> Linux, BSD, OSX, and many more.  So, Rails would give you much greater
> flexibility in choice of platforms.
>=20

Which few people actually need. It's a requirement to be evaluated as
any other, if you're doing a one-off app, or one for a long-term Windows
house, portability doesn't add value to the customer.

David Vallner


--------------enig201D7B903353C52D2F273948
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc"

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (MingW32)

iD8DBQFFVca7y6MhrS8astoRAt7hAJsFCSdNYRdGpi4Q59g3yP39CGz6tQCePOTm
827FxuIOaq4bWJvNJLcvx2Y=
=Ujm8
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--------------enig201D7B903353C52D2F273948--