From: "Booker C.Bense" Date: 2006-11-03T04:20:16+09:00 Subject: Re: bayesian classifiers in ruby? -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- In article <2d81dedb0611021036t5e47d35ex55c294e634873b59@mail.gmail.com>, Giles Bowkett wrote: >> As long as you analyze natural language, both seem suited, although with >> different degrees of complexity under the hood, both have a very simple >> interface: define a category and train it. Then a guess interface to >> evaluate candidates. > >I'm hoping to develop yet another spam filter. in that sense I can >only say I'm sort of analyzing natural language. Not all of it is >natural language, some of it is code. In the Paul Graham thing where >he came up with this idea, if I remember right, he said that a font >tag with the color red turned out to be the single most reliable >indicator of spam. Obviously in HTML e-mail there are going to be >similar trends. However if the tokenizer is the only problem that may >be something I can change without too much stress. > Long ago, I wrote an interface to the ifile program and I use that in my spam/email filtering. ifile is abandomware at the moment. I think I posted it on the ruby mailing list at ome point, you might try searching for it. _ Booker C. Bense -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: 2.6.2 iQCVAwUBRUpDBWTWTAjn5N/lAQFx9QP+NqHWWcudTBnJK3u2qofqheu6p0hJ3W2I L6elwknvioDWRuwWO/rksM2DZXwQ6trTHkpEnh0REEsWGl6n683ckuYBbr/ElVA2 9SfGWM0cXspEVX6Xsx/xFsnpF8mdF6le6SdxSEHr0HGhq+8NY1HFoLSOEKdEIBo6 p2sZwJ6+94Q= =1IG0 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----