From: Rich Kilmer <rich@...>
Date: 2001-10-09T11:53:02+09:00
Subject: [ruby-talk:22275] Re: This is not wanted. BRITNEY SPEARS NAKED----WOW!!!!!!

I agree, if people are bothered with the spam, set up client-side filtering rules.

That way each person can have it the way the want it!

-Rich

> -----Original Message-----
> From: matz@ev.netlab.jp [mailto:matz@ev.netlab.jp]On Behalf Of Yukihiro
> Matsumoto
> Sent: Monday, October 08, 2001 10:44 PM
> To: ruby-talk ML
> Subject: [ruby-talk:22274] Re: This is not wanted. BRITNEY SPEARS
> NAKED----WOW!!!!!!
> 
> 
> Hi,
> 
> In message "[ruby-talk:22248] Re: This is not wanted. BRITNEY 
> SPEARS NAKED----WOW!!!!!!"
>     on 01/10/09, David Alan Black <dblack@candle.superlink.net> writes:
> 
> |Re: "Ruby" as anti-stop word:
> |
> |I dunno.  Searching for it on www.ruby-talk.org:
> 
> I disagree.  Many posts including mine do not include the word "Ruby"
> in them, but still useful.  I hate spams, but I hate to change my life
> for spams more (if spams stays this much in comp.lang.ruby).
> 
> 							matz.