From: David Vallner <david@...>
Date: 2006-10-23T09:27:08+09:00
Subject: Re: A Comparison Of Dynamic and Static Languiges

--------------enigF3B7F7C22C3A216CF9B73CA0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Bil Kleb wrote:
> I thought we were Rubyists not judgmental grammar police.
>=20

It's not the bad grammar (or rather, spelling) that's being bashed, but
the lack of any effort whatsoever (running a spellchecker) to improve it.=


Non-native speakers tend to show problems with sentence construction
rather than spelling. I've yet to see one instance of that (a problem
not solvable by trivial computer-assisted means) being criticised,
despite the fact there are posts I sometimes have to literally decipher.

David Vallner


--------------enigF3B7F7C22C3A216CF9B73CA0
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc"

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (MingW32)

iD8DBQFFPAxny6MhrS8astoRAiiVAJ0ee8jH5enJNE6ecvMZWSjQSAeSFACeJYCB
bx8ITRNZqBOlNgi6LHZZQpM=
=9cDh
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--------------enigF3B7F7C22C3A216CF9B73CA0--