From: "Seth E." <seth_ruby@...>
Date: 2006-10-23T08:09:38+09:00
Subject: Re: Ruby-ize me (or at least my code)

Just wanted to clarify:  I know that there are better ways to do a 
Linked List in Ruby... namely the Array object seems to have everything 
you would need.  So the code here is just an exercise, and I'm curious 
how the same code can be made more ruby-ish

Also.....

Seth E. wrote:
>     # Weakly typed languages have their downsides? :-)
>     return unless head.class == ElemLL

doh!  I meant *dynamically* typed... I know Ruby is Strongly typed.  And 
I also *do* understand the advantages of a dynamically typed language 
:-)


-- 
Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.