From: Bret Pettichord <bret@...>
Date: 2006-10-23T06:05:43+09:00
Subject: Re: Recommendations for a Ruby Wiki, preferably with bidi support?

------=_Part_113574_25138633.1161551139780
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

On 10/22/06, Joel VanderWerf <vjoel@path.berkeley.edu> wrote:
>
>
> If I were developing a wiki, I'd try using something like my FSDB[1] lib
> (or maybe KirbyBase[2], which I don't know well), which uses the file
> system for persistence, and is pure ruby. Then you can use whatever
> revision control system you want on those files (the file granularity is
> small and controllable), and the same goes for backups, journaling,
> indexing, etc. And at the end of the proverbial day what you've got on
> disk is a file hierarchy of wiki entries (plus heterogeneously formatted
> files, if you want) which can survive the toolset you used to access them.


I believe that Instiki is moving towards SQLite and Pimki is moving to
KirbyBase.

Bret

------=_Part_113574_25138633.1161551139780--