From: Paul Lutus <nospam@...>
Date: 2006-10-22T01:45:08+09:00
Subject: Re: Ruby and Perl

Paul Lynch wrote:

/ ...

> However, I suspect that the poster was looking for examples of
> projects that had failed by non-OO methods, but succeeded with OO.

I understand. This argument would be difficult to construct, because OO
projects tend not to follow monotonically from their failed, non-OO
predecessors. If a new, successful OO project follows five years after a
disastrous, wasteful non-OO project, would those responsible even be
willing to associate the two?

-- 
Paul Lutus
http://www.arachnoid.com