From: Ross Bamford Date: 2006-10-21T18:25:37+09:00 Subject: Re: Array#to_s in Ruby 1.9 Head On Sat, 2006-10-21 at 09:04 +0900, Joel VanderWerf wrote: > Ross Bamford wrote: > > On Fri, 2006-10-20 at 06:34 +0900, gwtmp01@mac.com wrote: > >> Mauricio Fernandez writes in http://eigenclass.org/hiki.rb?Changes+in > >> +Ruby+1.9+update+5 > >> that Ruby 1.9 Head has changed Array#to_s to be an alias for > >> Array#to_inspect. > >> > >> What is the motivation for that change? > >> print a > >> becomes > >> a.each { |x| print x } > >> > >> It seems like an unnecessary change that takes away a very nice > >> default behavior. > > > > FWIW I find I need 'puts ary.inspect' much more often than 'puts ary', > > so I think this is a good change. > > (Why 'puts ary.inspect' instead of 'p ary' ?) Good point. I'm not sure where that 'puts' came from anyway, I blame late-night typing ;) Thinking about it now, the more common case where this would save me typing is string interpolation. > I suspect there is a fair amount of code that depends on > > print a > > being the same as > > print *a > > This would be the case if you are thinking of an array of strings as an > array of lines. For example, if you are writing a method whose input, a, > is the contents of a text file _either_ as a string _or_ as an array of > lines, then > > print a > > has the same behavior on all inputs. > > With the change in Array#to_a, you don't have this nice duck-typing, but > you get it back if you use splat: > > print *a > > (that works when a is a string, at least in 1.8.4) > > I'm not against the change, just thinking about damage control. > Certainly, I have such code myself that would need to be changed to deal with this. I'm already resigned to the fact that some of my code will break when 1.9 becomes mainstream so I guess this would cause extra typing in the immediate, but I'm still sure it'd save me keystrokes in the long run. Generally, MHO is that arrays (and hashes too - should this change encompass Hash#to_s as well?), as data structures, should retain some indication of that structure when asked for a string representation. For me at least, the current behaviour of simply joining the elements is rarely useful - I almost always need to either join(', ') or map { .. } arrays somehow for non-debug output anyway. -- Ross Bamford - rosco@roscopeco.REMOVE.co.uk