From: HarryO Date: 2001-10-04T20:27:25+09:00 Subject: [ruby-talk:22082] Re: Marshal won't dump a Proc In article , "Paul Brannan" wrote: > How about the following? The only major disadvantage is that it will be > a little bit slower than using a real Proc: As I've already said to Paul in a separate reply, I like this approach, since it's a nice class in itself, and it makes for a neat, orthogonal way of handling the issue I had. I hacked his code slightly, to make it not inherit from DelegateClass, but simple implement a call() method itself. I haven't heard back from Paul yet as to whether there's a particular reason he went in that direction, so if anyone else can explain what I'd be missing by having a call() method directly in DumpableProc I'd appreciate it.