From: ts <decoux@...>
Date: 2001-10-04T15:34:43+09:00
Subject: [ruby-talk:22054] Re: Perl Apocalypse 3.

>>>>> "B" == Brian F Feldman <green@FreeBSD.org> writes:

B> NO!!!!!  Absolutely not!  Ruby does _not_ have a confusing mass of hundreds 
B> of operators, and would never be the same if this kind of stuff being 
B> proposed and accepted in Perl 6 were adopted.  The syntax for Perl 6 
B> originally looked like a nicer, more OO-natural Perl 5, but now is starting 
B> to look an order of magnitude worse as the operator-soup continues to grow 
B> amazingly.

 When I used this P language the name of my scripts was a.pl, now see the
 RFC 082 (and the reference to Unicode operators)

  http://www.perl.com/pub/a/2001/10/02/apocalypse3.html?page=4

 :-)))


Guy Decoux