From: David Vallner <david@...>
Date: 2006-10-17T06:00:36+09:00
Subject: Re: What is the reason for this syntax?

--------------enig307ACC39F32FF13AE0E0B995
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Rimantas Liubertas wrote:
> Er, which version of HTML do you have in mind? HTML2, HTM3.2, HTML4,
> HTML4.01, HTML5, XHTML Basic, XHTML 1.0, XHTML 1.1 or XHTML2?
>=20

XHTML1.0 served as text/html, or application/xhtml+xml? *ducks*

As a side note, I think the W3C is a laughable excuse for a standards
body, what with instead of trying to reconcile differences and maintain
a stable status quo they focus instead of reams upon reams of documents
reinventing many wheels in syntax with lots of angle brackets. Some
people on it have their heads right side up, but whoever went on and
detached the XML data model from its text representation deserves being
slapped around.

David Vallner


--------------enig307ACC39F32FF13AE0E0B995
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc"

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (MingW32)

iD8DBQFFM/Luy6MhrS8astoRApKbAJ9Ih+/jrlrdwGmQ+dEjnn/N1tQjzgCfReo1
ExXAOQQHzwCyoh/RnkLLsn4=
=bQC9
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--------------enig307ACC39F32FF13AE0E0B995--