From: atbusbook@...
Date: 2006-10-16T13:05:15+09:00
Subject: Re: Lisp dinamism vs ML safety


Jeremy Tregunna wrote:
> On 06-10-15, at 23:45, atbusbook@aol.com wrote:
>
> > I am More of a Ruby guy but i programed in CL and Scheme and SML.
> > dynamic typeing allows for less code and faaster develipment. static
> > typeings safty benifits are pointless becaus the #  of bugs is
> > preporial to the lines_of_code. a line of code not needed is a correct
> > line of code!!!!! and how often do you get type errors
>
> A line of code not needed is a bug; it complicates maintenance and
> adds unnecessary complexity.
>
> --
> Jeremy Tregunna
> jtregunna@blurgle.ca
what i ment was a line of code not nesasary to write and not writen is
a correct line of code sorry for the ambiguity