From: Jeremy Tregunna <jtregunna@...>
Date: 2006-10-16T12:51:11+09:00
Subject: Re: Lisp dinamism vs ML safety


On 06-10-15, at 23:45, atbusbook@aol.com wrote:

> I am More of a Ruby guy but i programed in CL and Scheme and SML.
> dynamic typeing allows for less code and faaster develipment. static
> typeings safty benifits are pointless becaus the #  of bugs is
> preporial to the lines_of_code. a line of code not needed is a correct
> line of code!!!!! and how often do you get type errors

A line of code not needed is a bug; it complicates maintenance and  
adds unnecessary complexity.

--
Jeremy Tregunna
jtregunna@blurgle.ca