From: gwtmp01@...
Date: 2006-10-12T04:41:38+09:00
Subject: Re: Singleton Class Constants


On Oct 11, 2006, at 3:13 PM, dblack@wobblini.net wrote:
> I prefer it without that, since that makes it deviate from the #class
> method, which it's otherwise precisely parallel to.  I'd rather that
> singleton_class work like class than that it work like class_eval.
> Otherwise you've got a situation where all classes except singleton
> classes have to call class_eval, and I don't see any grounds for
> granting that privilege.

I agree with David's point about the discrepancy but couldn't that
be also resolved by changing the standard #class method to behave like
Ara's proposed #singleton_class ?

Gary Wright