From: ptkwt@...1.aracnet.com (Phil Tomson)
Date: 2001-10-02T11:31:04+09:00
Subject: [ruby-talk:21913] Re: Let's work on Windows support

In article <20011001192708.A89625@codedogs.ca>,
Eli Green  <eli.green@codedogs.ca> wrote:
>from Sean Chittenden on 2001-10-02 at 01:32:16:
>
>APR isn't in a state where it's recommended for use as a shared library yet,
>so static linking would be the way to go for the time being. So while we'd be
>adding a dependency to APR, we'd be getting rid of the dependency of Cygwin,
>and it could be bundled as one InstallShield executable.
>

Would giving up cygwin for APR just be swapping for another set of 
problems?

Phil