From: "Cameron, Gemma (UK)" <Gemma.Cameron@...>
Date: 2006-10-11T21:11:44+09:00
Subject: Re: newgem - Create gems for your libraries and apps


Again I love how this mailing list always sounds like it's talking about
me... ( : 

Gem

-----Original Message-----
From: list-bounce@example.com [mailto:list-bounce@example.com] On Behalf
Of Dr Nic
Sent: 11 October 2006 12:59
To: ruby-talk ML
Subject: Re: newgem - Create gems for your libraries and apps

               *** WARNING ***

This mail has originated outside your organization, either from an
external partner or the Global Internet. 
     Keep this in mind if you answer this message. 

Robert MannI wrote:
> This is great. You're cooking up one sweet Ruby library after another.
> 
> Calling it "gemify" isn't an option? Sounds sweeter.

Unfortunately all voting on project names happens before the project is
released. That is, I voted alone between: newgem, gemnew, new_gem,
gem_new. You get the jist of my unimaginative options.

I like gemify as a command name though. Perhaps I'll add it in the bin
folder as a duplicate, just for you :)

Nic

--
Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.





********************************************************************
This email and any attachments are confidential to the intended
recipient and may also be privileged. If you are not the intended
recipient please delete it from your system and notify the sender.
You should not copy it or use it for any purpose nor disclose or
distribute its contents to any other person.
********************************************************************