From: Jonathan Hudson Date: 2006-10-07T18:30:10+09:00 Subject: Re: In the year 2525 David Vallner wrote: > Jim v. Tess wrote: >> Is there a reason why Time.local can't handle dates beyond 2038? I know >> that's when the number of second since 1970 exceeds 2^32, but can't a >> big, strong language like Ruby handle it? >> > > Because it uses the underlying platform's time manipulation functions? And brings interesting portability issues (not only for ruby). $ irb >> RUBY_PLATFORM => "x86_64-linux" >> Time.local(2525) => Mon Jan 01 00:00:00 GMT 2525