From: Trans Date: 2006-10-05T21:00:06+09:00 Subject: Re: dynamically changing superclass/mixins Jeremy Tregunna wrote: > We don't need block notation, everywhere you'd use blocks in Ruby, we > just use message objects. They're cheap, have the same benefits, and > tie well into Io's conceptual unification. Which is why you write a for loop like this? for(i, 99, 1, writeln(i, " of beer on the wall, ", i, " of beer,") writeln("take one down, pass it around,") writeln(bottle(i - 1), " of beer on the wall.") ) T.