From: Mariano Kamp Date: 2006-10-04T01:07:11+09:00 Subject: Re: rdoc -> pdf Hi Gregory, On Sep 28, 2006, at 10:15 PM, Gregory Brown wrote: > I reformatted your post a tiny bit, to make it eaier to respond to... > hope you don't mind... > Nope, not at all ;-) > On 9/28/06, Mariano Kamp wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I found the below quoted message when searching for a pdf output >> formatter for rdoc. > > >> On 12/15/05, Austin Ziegler wrote: >> >> > The Pickaxe2 has a PDF version available for purchase from the >> > Pragmatic Bookshelf. On the other hand, if someone wants to make a >> > RDoc formatter using PDF::Writer, I'll try to provide what >> assistance >> > I can. >> >> Ugh. This sounds like something that may need to go into Ruport. I >> hate when that happens! >> >> Would people be interesting in being able to use rdoc formatting to >> generate PDFs using Ruby Reports? If so... i'll put it on the >> dogpile >> of features to be added this winter when I'm working full time on >> Ruport for a couple weeks. > > Wow, this is an old message! We've completely rewritten Ruport > since then. :) > >> Any idea if there has been progress made? > > We didn't get a roaring response of Yes! Well, I would like to have the docs available as pdf for offline use and because I never really quite got the hang of searching the html docs efficiently. > [..] > However, what we can offer is support for anyone interested in doing > this. I've used htmldoc to convert html to pdf, and it'd be cool if > we can get something more robust into Ruport. But rdoc already provides simple markup as a basis, doesn't it? Using html would mean to reverse engineer the semantics from a format that is already rendered for presentation, wouldn't it? > It might be better to attack it from the HTML to PDF direction rather > than the rdoc to PDF direction, since it would be more general. (Then > one could use textile,markdown,rdoc, whatever, convert to html and > ruport could then render to PDF) Not quite sure that I get that. Where exactly comes textile or markdown into the picture here? > If anyone wants to take the initiative on something like that, go > ahead and catch up with us on the Ruport mailing > list(http://lists.stonecode.org/listinfo.cgi/ruport-stonecode.org) or > in #ruport on Freenode. All of our developers are currently tied > down, but we can take the time to help get the information out there > that would be needed for folks who wanted to build something like > this. I think I expected this to be something like a new output format for rdoc, like xml etc. is today. Your thinking goes along the lines to build something that works outside of rdoc in ruport, or am I missing the point here? Cheers, Mariano