From: Martin Coxall Date: 2006-10-04T00:51:53+09:00 Subject: Re: redefining splat? On 10/3/06, Adam Sanderson wrote: > I would agree with Matt, if you are trying to redefine the splat > operator (is that really what we're calling it? neat) Pshaw. Somebody who's never read the INTERCAL reference manual? http://www.muppetlabs.com/~breadbox/intercal-man/tonsila.html Character Name Use (if any) . spot identify 16-bit variable : two-spot identify 32-bit variable , tail identify 16-bit array ; hybrid identify 32-bit array # mesh identify constant = half-mesh ' spark grouper ` backspark ! wow equivalent to spark-spot ? what unary XOR " rabbit-ears grouper rabbit equivalent to ears-spot | spike % double-oh-seven percentage qualifier - worm used with angles < angle used with worms > right angle ( wax precedes line label ) wane follows line label [ U turn ] U turn back { embrace } bracelet * splat flags invalid statements (I72) & ampersand * unary AND V V (or book) unary OR bookworm unary XOR (I72) $ big money binary interleave � change binary interleave ~ sqiggle binary select _ flat worm � overline indicates "times 1000" + intersection separates list items / slat \ backslat @ whirlpool unary BUT � hookworm ^ shark (or simply sharkfin) unary XOR (additive) Martin