From: gwtmp01@...
Date: 2006-09-29T08:52:28+09:00
Subject: Re: continuations across fork?


On Sep 28, 2006, at 7:44 PM, Clifford T. Matthews wrote:
> Presumably there's a reason why that second check is there, but I'm
> not sufficiently versed in Ruby internals to know why.  It's quite
> possible that a different check could be used that would allow my use
> of continuations but still disallow whatever bad thing the current
> check is designed to catch.

I also am not familiar with Ruby internals but now that I think about it
a little bit, it is probably there because of how signal handlers are
managed when transferring control between continuations and/or when
preparing to fork.


Gary Wright