From: Vincent Fourmond <vincent.fourmond@9online.fr>
Date: 2006-09-28T00:41:03+09:00
Subject: Re: Ruby with Qt or GTK ?

Jason Roelofs wrote:
> No, Gregarican is right, Qt is not free for commercial applications but
> free (GPL'd) for non-commercial / OSS applications.

  Well, let's put it this way: Qt is dual licensed, one is commercial,
one is GPL. So it *is* free/open source software. But I agree that you
can't really build commercial applications with a GPL license. I was
merely pointing out what seemed a terminology mistake.

  Cheers !

	Vince