From: Jan Svitok <jan.svitok@...>
Date: 2006-09-25T22:03:49+09:00
Subject: Re: New! ObjectiveView Issue 9

On 9/25/06, Thomas Adam <thomas.adam22@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Mon, 25 Sep 2006 17:00:13 +0900
> "zoat" <enogrob@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Issue #9 of ObjectiveView [pdf], a highly respected on-line journal
> > has a sort of Ruby Special: lots of articles devoted to Ruby, and
> > Ruby on Rails.
> > http://www.ratio.co.uk/objectiveview.html
> > http://www.ratio.co.uk/ov9pdf.pdf
>
> I won't reiterate the comments posted by William Crawford, but what I
> will say is definitely *heed* them.  I agree with everything he has
> said.
>
> As for the issue, it was the first time I had read it, and I quite
> liked it.  I have often been interested in extreme/pair programming, so
> it was nice to see some applications of its use.
>
> As for the Ruby side of things, note that the article by Amy Hoy
> contains on or two deprecated uses within Ruby that ought not to have
> been allowed to propagate through.  (c.f. ''foo.type'' should be
> ''foo.class'').  Was she writing that article based on Ruby 1.6.X?
> Still, that aside, it ought to give your readership a little bit of an
> idea about Ruby.
>
> Was that the sort of feedback you were after, if any, I might add?

None. It seems to be a bot.